“Any rationally functioning mind could be rendered to accept an attitude of intolerance that does not follow along the pathological lines of the logical thinking human”. That statement represented, word for word, the surmise of an answer to a question in an ongoing debate respectively relating to the truly criminal minded, in specific; how do you effectively control crime in the 21st century?
It is, to me, an oddity to expect one thing to happen yet another thing happens instead; to anxiously anticipate raindrops to immediately start falling from the skies, and suddenly hailstones rapidly begins falling. In a sense, it is the true metaphor of life and everyday living here on the planet Earth that engages us all with mental obstacles of obstructions that, more than often, manifest themselves to personify whoever our perceived adversaries may be.
One moment, our minds are actively stimulated by the contents of our immediate surroundings, and then suddenly; our minds are selectively toning out all frequencies that do not meet a predetermined [high/low] stimulus value. The symptomatic victims of such disorder can quickly and easily develop deep and unrelenting desires to experience an insatiable amount of physical pleasure to stimulate, or to put at ease; the sudden anxiety and discomfort experienced by their mind.
The other symptomatic extreme manifests itself through our subconscious urge to inflect a dangerous amount of physical and emotional distress upon ourselves and others; this can be publicly observed from a human prospective of the lone wolf verses the pack leader. The resemblance to anything remotely equivalent to an emotionally charged individual displaying violent tendencies towards the status quo ought to be noted as a mere coincidence and surly, no more than, unfounded accusations.
Ask yourselves; do you find it unacceptable to do anything you dislike? The flipside and hard reality to that question is the fact that, on average, 9 out of 10 persons were doing something they disliked. When faced with the choice of individual freedom against the threat of social discomforts, the masses would often choose the lesser of two evils or compromise; forego certain individual freedoms for some social comforts.
What is one truth and will invariably remain a constant in the nature of human is this fact; the greatest ability humanity possesses, from creation to this day, is our adaptability to changes, and it’s because we adapt to change so well; what it meant to be human now takes on a different prospective. The forbidden X-Gene or alien link that eluded scientific and religious minds cannot be ruled out as a possible reason explaining humanities sudden interest in all things self-destructive.
Our worthiest guess as to why the living finds so much fascination and intrigue in the world of the dead leaves one to consider the burden of life coupled with the daily cost of living per individual. With an estimated population of 6 plus-billion people living on the planet Earth to date; the collective cost of living increases with every new born child, a grave need to maintain an adequate number of individual upon Earth becomes that more a necessity.
Some had suggested, in times past, a theoretical premise that “all life were weighed upon the same scale and measured by the same rule” surly this same standard is used today but for the completely opposite reason. The policy of today is not geared towards the wealth of your soul, but rather, the worth of your bank account. This premise echoes the sentiments of those that justify their carnal lust for pleasure and strong desire for material worth, those whom are taught to accept an individual’s worth as equal to that which he/she had achieved in life.
The theoretical premise goes on to suggest “significant increases to revenue is produced as a byproduct to the reduction upon the overall expenditure”; the wording in the structure of this premise gave license for many to think of and devise methods by-which to stimulate the economy and increase their worth, and, at the same time; becoming the agent that induce fear, incite riots, begin wars and cause death. What is, in a sense, perceived as the modal of civil society, is simply a system upon the lasting principles of lies, stealing and murder.
The social-economic system adapted by the international markets seemingly is tuned into what is negative and self-destructive that it made provisions for total collapse of its own structure. A system that that is rooted in the practices of hand come, hand go; that it with one hand offers benefits and with the other take it away. Behind the thin vales of modern society rest the shocking truth regarding the seemingly simplistic systematic structure that fuels the economy, I’ve made a listed as follows;
1. 1. To provide for doctors you need sickness.
2. 2. To justify protection you need fear and violence.
3. 3. To accommodate magistrates and lawyers you need criminal.
4. 4. To elect a bad leader you need ignorant electorates.
To sum up and put a cap on my social observation, I draw your attention upon a phrase that gives credence to the life as being the greatest gift of all, however as in life; all things are relative.
No comments:
Post a Comment