In ancient and modern
society, those who commit antisocial acts are widely considered and often
accepted as criminals – persons of limited moral fortitude and rational conviction.
This viewpoint justified a necessity to legislate the use of cruel and unusual
ways of treatment, either for prevention (as a proactive cure), or for
punishment (as a reactive cure).
However, in both instances, whether by proactive or reactive means, the
“criminals” themselves rarely received proper assessment toward clearly
identifying not simply the symptom but the cause of their individual antisocial
behavior; that specifically identified not just the answers to how a crime was
committed but also why.
Further studies have
shown that the accepted “civilized” cure for crimes, in ancient and modern
society, are considered barbaric forms of human torture: the criminal
involuntarily forfeits their basic human rights, and are then treated as wild
animals – locked behind iron bars for extended periods and constantly
maintained under armed-guarded surveillance. Degraded to a mere property of the
state and forced to undergo intolerable conditions, the criminal learns (in
order to survive) to accept and willingly adapt primal behaviors. In an attempt
to rehabilitate the human within the criminal through the cure of imprisonment,
we unwittingly reduce the human from a partial criminal into a fully functional
bloodthirsty beast.
From this viewpoint,
civil society prisons are merely staging ground for the educating and promotion
of predatory violators - whereupon entry, a reluctant and misled minor offender
(in order to survive) gravitates toward willfully committing major offences. Wherein a person of limited moral fortitude
and rational conviction would had rehabilitated; now instead leaves only a
shadow and a shell of what once resembled humanity. Is this a symptomatic condition of civility,
or the rational result of a twenty-first century legal system?
As I had afore state:
“criminals themselves rarely received proper assessment toward clearly
identifying not simply the symptom but the cause of their individual antisocial
behavior”. It is in this light that our
legal system ought to place close attention. Based upon a level and the quality
of ‘proper’ education undertaken led me to conclude that criminals are persons
afflicted with mile to acute forms of ignorance: A criminal being one who (for
any reason) lacks adequate ability to make rational decisions, and a crime is
merely a symptomatic result of an irrational decision. At this point, the question, which
necessitates an answer, is simply this: What is the root cause of criminal
behavior?
In ancient times,
criminal behavior was widely viewed, and accepted, as the work of evil doers
under direct influence of demonic forces.
Just recently, in the nineteenth century, physicians put forth their
theories suggesting that irrational behaviors can be link to certain brain
disorders. More recently, in the
twentieth century, clinical psychologists linked criminal behavior to a mental
anomaly deep within the brain cells that prohibits the pulses of rational
thoughts. This mental anomaly, after
undergoing further psychological research, resulted in the clinical
identification of a “criminal gene”.
Further researches have genetically identified the “criminal gene”
resting dormant within children as early as infancy.
Statistical studies can
directly link increase escalation of crime and criminal activities in civil
societies equal only to increase escalation of the birth rate in the migrant
population within that society. Cross-contamination at genetic levels his
proven to be deadlier and more destructive than both world war one and two
combined. Wherein the “criminal gene” is
(negligently) release into the gene pool of a (once) passive people, resulting
in uncontrollable havoc on a massive level not before seen or written in the
historic records of that culture.
This fatal epidemic
predicted to continue unabated until and/or unless the indigenous population
decides to personally arm and to fortify their “strong-towers” with full and
proper knowledge. Not mere reactive
protection but rather proactive prevention would prove a more better and rational
choice in an all-out war against the forces of ignorance.
It is the human-animal
nature to want something, yet only a small segment of society would willingly
offend the law in its acquisition. Hate resides within the psyche of the
human-animal, yet only a small segment of society would willingly express
hatred with deadly violence. Therefore, a systematic strategy must be
constantly engage toward identifying individual possessing anti-social
tendencies while their “criminal gene” is yet in its dormant state. Through a process of selective coupling,
based upon modified gene analysis, the family units would successfully and
securely reproduce offspring’s void of defects.
If men knew better,
they would do better. Therefore, the
solution to crime is not through imprisonment and extended periods away from
society, nor by corporal punishment but rather through systematic reeducation
programs geared toward civil rehabilitation: A clinically structured
environment wherein antisocial offenders receive necessary holistic information
for lucid mental and spiritual states, and for improved physical health.
The challenge now is to
restore and not restrict civility; to uplift hope and not encourage
hopelessness; to invigorate the intellect, and end the senseless promotion of
ignorance.
1.
The first challenge ought to be gear
toward creating a stable environment that provokes the criminally minded to
consider the folly of irrational thoughts and actions.
2.
The second challenge ought to be gear
toward evoking the rewards of cultivating spiritual values and rational
thoughts.
3.
The third challenge ought to be gear
toward stimulating civil awareness and ethical conducts.
4.
The fourth challenge ought to be upon promoting
the rewards of healthy physical lifestyle.
Once the criminals’
body, mind and spirit are, equally rendered, empty and cleanse, can the process
of healing fill both with principles that promote healthier lifestyles
conducive toward civil awareness and ethical conduct.
No comments:
Post a Comment